warren aug 07
ERWIN
Comments
Nice Vid. I enjoyed it. We market properties and other things on youtube, we hope to create a large network of people interested in making money. Your video gets a five star rating from us. I hope you feel the same about ours.
Under Bush, we doubled the national debt, nationalized the world’s largest insurer, nationalized the banking system, and nationalized the automakers. Bad policy leads to socialism by force. Socialism has been forced upon us long before Obama even takes office. The wheels were set in motion by lowering taxes and increasing money printing when Bush took office in the face of a mounting debt. Before he took office, we had a budget surplus!
I have a lot of respect for wealthy people. But, when somebody sleeps in the same bed with the Hussein Obama freak, I have to puke. just say no to THE SOCIALIST AGENDA! and the worthless people that want to force it down everybody’s throat.
Maybe bookhound63 has it right.
Buffet has enjoyed his glory more than he would ever let on. Obama is a socialist at best. Warren voted his own pocketbook and, thats the way it is. He thinks that he is buying his way into Heaven. Hmm…..
What is up with Warren Buffett? Has he gone senile? There is nothing about Obama’s plan that supports Capitalism. Maybe Buffett has discovered a new source of power. Better than money…it’s … Government control! Socialism anyone?
The biggest capitalists are the only ones who have money to donate. It doesn’t mean they are more philantropic
one thing people may be surprised to hear but is the absolute truth-not opinion, is that the reason rich and poor live nearly completely opposite lifestyles, is because they have completely opposite mindstates, meaning they think almost nothing like, when it comes to views, beliefs, perceptions, and understandings of alot of things, i can easily give examples if anyones interested, but you’d be surprised how little of difference there really is between the two, it shocked me, but im glad i know
nothing n besides, emotionally driven choices/decisions are bad for business anyways, so they dont really got much valid credible things to argue about
mentalities and translated into their own arguments simply because of the millions of times they’ve heard different claims, not because its there claims, cuz its been programmed possibly without them knowing it, media commercials etc. r especially skilled in doing that, and other things i see are that their arguments never really include any rational or logic argument and actually saying something, its mostly emotionally driven comments, which go nowhere and say absolutely
rafaelnadal, much respect and mutual agreement from myself to you, the problem i have wit alot of anti-commerce/capitalism minded people is that every bit of their 2 cents and arguments ONLY comprise of the following: inaccurate, misguided, biased, insincere, and cliche arguments against the topic that are simply said out of either bitterness or because its been programmed into their
and my last word is the biggest capitalists are also the biggest philanthropists so shut your lazy, socialist, doped-out, pie-holes!!! You are simply confused and miseducated about how the world.
These hippies should live in a socialist country with no money for 10 years.Then they’ll realise whats good about capitalism (studying,jobs,getting paid).Self made billionnaires are smart.They thrive on capitalism and are visionaries amongst humans with no direction.Charities pull in more money now with the internet/computers which were invented by capitalists!These morons,will add 1+1 and make 5,that’s WITH a calculator.You think the weed you smoke was sold to you by a socialist drug dealer?
I couldn’t agree with you more. Warren could donate all of his money to his kids, but he won’t. He’s donating the bulk of it to charities and enough so that his children will be very comfortable. Nobody can say anything about that decision. Buffet could be a lot more greedy.
and another thing, Buffett creates liquidity, jobs, and wealth that in someway or another will be given to charities in the end (and we are talking about billions of $s). How much do any of you added together think you will donate from your estates?…point made? So get of your unsubstantiated high horses, make your own money THEN help the causes dear to you. That’s better than moaning about which charity a billionnaire is going to give his money to or am I wrong?
I would like to see how you would like to be told who you should be giving your money to in your autumn years. Exactly, none of your business! The prepotence of some of you dogoodders (who most of the time are out there doing “good” for some sort of personal psychological kick anyway so technically are still as selfish as any other capitalist except your greed is for moral points rather than monetary gain).
true that would seriously **** with his gravvy money
Lol. I promise Warren Buffet, the richest man in the world, isn’t interested in Socialism.
2007, fishermen, tribal leaders and environmental leaders from northwest California went to Omaha to ask Buffett to tear down four dams on the Klamath River. The dams, owned by Berkshire Hathaway subsidiary Pacific Corp., are currently up for relicensing. The dams have had a devastating effect on the Klamath River fisheries. Members of the Hupa, Yurok, and Karuk tribes who depend on these fisheries have been especially hard hit.
1974 The SEC opened a formal investigation into Warren Buffett1990 Scandals involving Salomon Brothers surfaced.2009 Scandals at goldman sacs? ge?2006 Buffett announced in June that he would gradually give away 85% of his Berkshire holdings to five foundations in annual gifts of stock, starting in July 2006. The largest contribution would go to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation NONE to Members of the Hupa, Yurok, and Karuk tribes? WHY NOT?
Democrats put buffett on a high pedestal,WHY? why did buffet not invest in mainstreet and rather wall street ? what happens if goldman sacs is drawn into the fbi probe? seems his $5 billion could have been invested in 57 states and would have had more impact than what he did? its buffet first rather than to make far less money for him that would have helped far more and still he would have made some but not as much?
Here’s what Warren Buffett knows….He can manipulate Obama’s policies and add to his fortune (that IS what he does best):
stockpickr . com /problog /820/
I would be so ecstatic to have this genius of a man as the Secretary of Treasury. Sadly, he hates meetings and clogging up his schedule, but what a great thing that would be to see an Obama presidency with a Buffet as Treasury Secretary
Socialism? With the goverment buying out AIG, Fannie and Freddie Mac…and now Bush is looking to buy out the banks? Mmmmmmmmmmmh, isn’t that socialism under a Rep. president. Sounds like you voted for socialism.
